Epistemology of open research systems

Authors

Keywords:

Knowledge, Complexity, Teaching, Research, People, Simplicity

Abstract

The current world is a mixture of historical events and interests of the hegemonically dominant societies, the foregoing is linked to the ancestral traditions of the peoples, considering the research processes as collective constructions that respond to various community problems, providing a range of possible alternative solutions. Complexity can be a tool to obtain freedom, decolonize thought, undiscipline education and science. This paper presents an analysis of complexity as a way of understanding open systems research for the study of diverse epistemologies such as simplicity, mechanicism and interculturality. A literature review was conducted and a review of the historical background and traditional methodologies in education, in contrast with the processes of knowledge transfer and re-signification that are used from and for indigenous peoples and communities. Consequently, the approaches proposed by the authors who addresses complexity with the dynamics of coexistence of the native and Afro-descendant peoples of Nicaragua were linked; also attached to this debate is the axis of interculturality, considering that this allows to recognize the existence of logical pluralism. Research from within will contribute to minimize the extraction of knowledge from our wise men and women. So, a fundamental axis is interculturality, through which the bases for the acceptance of “otherness” are established.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Canales, C., M. (2006) Metodologías de investigación social. [texto impreso]. —1ª ed. – Santiago: Lom Ediciones.

Castañeda, B. R. J. (2023) El nuevo paradigma de los sistemas abiertos. https://idus.us.es/bitstream/handle/11441/144007/El_nuevo_paradigma_de_los_sistemas_abiertos.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Cerón, M., A. (2016) Cuatro niveles de conocimiento en relación a la ciencia. Una propuesta taxonómica. https://dialnet.uniroja.es

Cubillos, F., Pérez, R., Inostroza, X., Pinto, D. y Pichihueche, R. (2022). Academia, investigación y pueblos indígenas: Reflexiones desde una experiencia de diálogo de saberes. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social, 11(1), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.15366/riejs2022.11.1.004

Maldonado, C. E. (2013). Educación e investigación en complejidad. Managua: Universidad Autónoma de Nicaragua, https://www.academia.edu/41114581/EDUCACI%C3%93N_E_INVESTIGACI%C3%93N_EN_COMPLEJIDAD_1_Maldonado_

Martínez, R., H. (2012). Metodología de la investigación. https://elibro.net/es/ereader/uraccan/39957?page=22

Najmanovich, D. (2011). Configurazoom-Los enfoques de la complejidad. Leonardo Rodríguez Zoya, La emergencia de los enfoques de la complejidad en América Latina, 2, 13-34.

Prada, R. (2013). Epistemología, Pluralismo y Desconolinización. https://rebelion.org/docs/167277.pdf

Ramírez, A. (2009) La teoría del conocimiento en investigación científica: una visión actual. http://www.scielo.org.pe/pdf/afm/v70n3/a11v70n3.pdf

URACCAN. (2021). Plan Intercultural de Vida Institucional 2021-2030. URACCAN.

Published

2022-11-11

How to Cite

Moraga López, J. del R., Wong Serrano, J. Y., Olivar Molina, S. A., & Allen Amador, T. T. (2022). Epistemology of open research systems. Indice: Revista De Educación De Nicaragua, 2(4), 55–64. Retrieved from https://revistaindice.cnu.edu.ni/index.php/indice/article/view/106

Issue

Section

Tema Central